I’m going to be on the radio tomorrow, talking about issues related to the election. It’s an international news show called The Global Current and it airs on WSOU 89.5 at 9:30 on Saturday mornings.
Not in the New York City/North New Jersey area? Worry not, you can still tune in. There’s web streaming of the show here and if you aren’t up by then the show is podcast and can be downloaded off of iTunes.
So please tune in for my first ever radio interview.
Radio Appearance
3 10 2008Comments : 1 Comment »
Categories : 2008 Election, Interview, Radio, WSOU
Post-Debate Thoughts
27 09 2008Most of my comments showed up on Twitter, so I won’t rehash them here. What I will focus on are thoughts about the debate as a whole and what it means.
Point 1: Probably no real winner. McCain met expectations on foreign policy but didn’t massively wow in any way. Likewise, Obama kinda reinforced his foreign policy lightweight-ness by massively misstating Kissinger’s thoughts on direct diplomacy, but he was collected enough otherwise to balance that out.
Other than that, only a few gaffes worth noting. McCain massively missed some opportunities to slam Obama, especially on tax issues. He also made some base angering points about Wall Street greed and the like. Meanwhile Obama generally came off as smug and arrogant, particularly with his “I have a bracelet too” remark. And they both were idiots for supporting sanctions – they’ve worked great with regards to Cuba.
Point 2: Obama is moving more and more to the left. His massive advocacy for tax hikes and hating on the free market doesn’t really make sense strategically. The hard left is already in the tank for him, he needs to pick up independents – and libertarians that can’t stand McCain’s stance on foreign policy are a key part of that group. Even if they care more about pot and the war, the fact is left-libertarians are still anti-tax and pro-free market. And even with the recent economic troubles, most Americans are still pretty anti-tax hikesObama is just alienating those voters, and for no good reason.
Point 3: Debates suck. Most of the questions were softballs, allowing the two to just spout talking points. Few if any tough questions for the whole night. And don’t even get me started on “How likely is it that we’ll see another 9/11?”.
EDIT: One major missed opportunity. McCain should have asked Obama if his plan to rebuild Georgia’s economy involved tax hikes for Georgians. It’s moves like that that leave Obama off-balance and stuttering – plus it would certainly put the lie to his claims that tax hikes are a good thing.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : 2008 Election, Debates
Debate Tonight
26 09 2008Seeing as McCain decided to do the debate after all (personally, probably just as well that he refused to continue to hang around D.C. and try to help since he obviously wasn’t listening to Mike Pence and the RSC), I’ll be watching the debate tonight, and as best I can, reason’s coverage of Bob Barr’s off-the-stage participation at the event they’re helping to sponsor.
Look for Twitter posts (http://www.twitter.com/thewaterman) and hopefully a debate follow-up post.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : 2008 Election, Debates
Good Ol’ Joe Biden
18 09 2008Back when Joe Biden got picked to be Obama’s VP I was pretty happy. I don’t think he strengthens the ticket that much and on top of that he strongly undercuts the change message of the ticket.
Even better though is Biden’s predilection to shooting his mouth off without thinking first. There was this time:
But he’s gone and topped all of that now. Yesterday he actually made the preposterous claim that it is patriotic to pay higher taxes – and by extending that logic, implying it is unpatriotic to resist higher taxes.
I really hope McCain goes and runs with this, something involving that quote juxtaposed against Jefferson, Adams, Washington, Paine, etc. It really showed the Obama campaign’s true stripes and if there’s any justice in America it will be the final nail in the Obama campaign’s coffin.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : 2008 Election
Time For Some To Reconsider Sarah Palin?
7 09 2008According to a recent post over at reason’s blog a lot of the early stories regarding Sarah Palin aren’t all they were cracked up to be.
Of course there was the initial one from Daily Kos claiming she didn’t really give birth to Trig, her youngest son, and we all know how that one went.
But there’s plenty of others that have been readily accepted, with the two most notable being she attempted to censor books as mayor of Wasilla and that she supports abstinence only sex-ed.
Interestingly enough, there seems to be less to both of these claims. On the the books issue, Jesse Walker notes that:
I don’t think the door is closed on this story — I hope to see more reporting on it — but whatever did happen, it’s a far cry from the over-the-top accusations that have been circulating online. (One frequently forwarded email lists dozens of books that Palin allegedly tried to take off the shelves. More than one of the volumes were actually published after the event.The list turned out to be cut-and-pasted from a catalog of “Books Banned at One Time in the United States.”)
And the article quotes a radio interview she gave as a candidate in 2006, where she indicates she is pro-contraception and has no problem with education of the use of condoms.
Like Jesse Walker, I have my issues with Palin. She’s much more militaristic on foreign policy than I’m comfortable, her stance on a lot of other issues is still unclear, and of course she accepted McCain’s offer to be his VP.
But that being said, we ought to examine her in light of her actual stances, not the rumour based distortions.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : 2008 Election, Political News, Politics, Sarah Palin
Sarah Palin: The Promise of a New Libertarian-Minded Republican Party?
2 09 2008I just saw an article over at Real Clear Politics making the case that Sarah Palin is a Western-style Libertarian (I’ll be the first to admit, I’ve always been a bit puzzled by Rocky Mountain libertarianism and the like, but I’m a Mid-Atlantic East Coast guy myself) and the best of the major party nominees for freedom.
I’d already liked a lot of what I’d read about her so far. She’s a big 2nd Amendment supporter, for school choice, a good fiscal conservative, and has taken on corrupt Republican bigwigs like Don Young and Ted Stevens (speaking of, what is the deal with Alaska that so many corrupt politicians come out of there, are polar bears finding fiscal conservatives easier to eat or something?). Even in the areas I disagree with her on, like abortion and creationism, she’s philosophically consistent, something far too few politicians are.
Thinking about the points this article makes, I’m convinced that if I lived in a swing state and thought it mattered I would vote for McCain in the hopes of a Palin presidency to follow. After all, with her reform record such a presidency could mean the ascension of Hensarling, Flake, Shadegg, Coburn, DeMint and others to rule of the party, something that is desperately needed.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : 2008 Election
Al Sharpton @ the DNC
26 08 2008Talk about hard to believe. At the Democratic National Convention a staffer from reason ran into Al Sharpton and got to see the following exchange:
Fan: Reverend, Reverend! Can you sign my pocket Constitution?Sharpton: (distracted) I won’t sign anything I haven’t read.
Hardly surprising to find that out. But when’s the last time a political figure ever spoke with such candor?
Story courtesy of Dave Weigel at Hit & Run.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : 2008 Election, Al Sharpton, Conventions, Stupidity
Excellent Video
11 06 2008I’m a huge fan of Americans for Tax Reform. I think they’re one of the top groups in D.C. and the work they do is absolutely vital in keeping taxes low and working to get them even lower.
I just saw this video while reading over the Friends of ATR blog and fell completely in love with it. I highly recommend you all watch it and then go and show it to all of your friends.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : 2008 Election, Earmarks, Taxes, YouTube
Super Tuesday Coverage
5 02 2008Hey everyone.
If you’re interested in live coverage of Super Tuesday my school’s radio station is covering it all night. You can listen online at www.wsou.net
I myself am following the news and blogs and forwarding stuff to people reporting on-air.
FOLLOW-UP:
Well the coverage went well. I was a bit mistaken, we only went until 10:30 so we missed some of the drama with California and the other Western states, but all in all it was a good night for coverage. Very professional and a great experience to be a part of.
In terms of results, not such a good night. I’ll write up a post soon on why I can never vote for John McCain.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Categories : 2008 Election
Harris Doesn’t Seem To Get It On Immigration
12 01 2008I was looking at Andy Harris (Republican vying for the nomination in MD-01 for those unaware) issues page and his section on immigration caught my eye.
According to Harris he:
“a firm believer in LEGAL immigration”
and yet he also says that:
” I have a very simple immigration plan. Enforce the laws we have on the books and NEVER allow amnesty!!”
Is Andy really that delusional? The current laws on immigration are completely absurd. To legally become a citizen of the United States requires years and years of wait time and a large amount of money while the individual is processed through the system – and just to get permanent residence. Then, once that is achieved there is another 5 years of wait before citizenship can be applied for plus more fees.
The simple fact is that the system is hopelessly broken. As is shown in this article from the American Spectator’s website, the law itself limits employment based visas to 120,00 per year there are 1.2 million people waiting on them. This backlog is doing massive damage to our economy and encourages a great many to consider reevaluating their decision to emigrate to the United States. Seeing as these immigrants are responsible for a significant portion of new businesses, patents, and other key elements of a growing economy we simply cannot afford to hamper their entrance to the country.
Even if they are able to get visas, the current laws are still heavily structured against immigrants. Sponsorship requirements frequently tie immigrants under visas to a particular employer, effectively preventing any sort of entrepreneurial activity. This is a serious issue when inefficient government bureaucracy leads to over a decade of wait time on processing permanent residency applications (don’t scoff, it happened to my girlfriend’s family).
Finally there is the citizenship test. I’ve seen the current one. I could answer most of it, but I’m a politics junkie. I guarantee most everyone I know who is a native citizen of the United States would probably fail that test. We simply have no right to demand a test that stringent unless we make all citizens take it to maintain their citizenship.
Is it really that hard then to imagine that basic laborers (which we desperately need, the U.S. birthrate is dangerously close to the point of simply holding the economy where it is, without an influx of workers from outside it will fall below that point soon and we will be unable to grow the economy)
So if people want to get serious about illegal immigration but support legal immigration then it is simply not enough to say enforce the laws currently on the books. As it stands the system’s inefficiencies and high costs naturally drive people to come illegally. There needs to be a massive overhaul of the current laws that streamlines and sharply cuts fees involved in the immigration process and simultaneously creates significantly harsher penalties for still illegally immigrating.
And that goes to all candidates, in all elections, not just you Andy.
Comments : Leave a Comment »
Tags: Immigration
Categories : 1st District, 2008 Election, Immigration
Follow on Twitter
Add on Facebook
E-mail Me

Recent Comments