New Jersey, This Is Your Government

9 03 2010

So, not only has New Jersey passed the idiocy known as Kyleigh’s Law, the firm it hired to make the decals also made vehicle inspection stickers for New York. Stickers that would not stay on license plates:

Up to 2.5 million of 13.5 million inspection stickers produced by SecureMark Decal and distributed to motorists in 2009 failed to stick, the Times reported.

Amid a public uproar, New York Department of Motor Vehicles Commissioner David J. Swarts issued a statement last May waiving the fee for replacement inspection and registration stickers and advising police to “use their discretion” upon encountering loose or taped stickers.

Now, I know Gov. Christie is doing a lot to help improve the state, but when a spokesperson for the State Motor Vehicle Commission says this problem isn’t a concern for the Kyleigh’s Law decals it makes you realize just how much work there is to do to make New Jersey a halfway decently governed state.

UPDATE: For those unfamiliar with it, Kyleigh’s Law is a NJ law requiring that all people under 21 and holding a Graduated Driver’s License must also have decals on their license plates identifying them as such. For more info, here’s the series of posts I’ve done on it, from oldest to newest:

Don’t Let NJ Make Driving While Young A Crime
More Problems With Kyleigh’s Law
Help Stop Kyleigh’s Law
Last Chance To Stop Kyleigh’s Law
I Really Hate New Jersey Sometimes
Standing Firm Against Kyleigh’s Law
Striking Back Against Kyleigh’s Law
More News on Kyleigh’s Law
News on Kyleigh’s Law and the Trautmann Suit
Disappointing News on Kyleigh’s Law





Immigration, The Right, and American Jobs

7 03 2010

Lately I have begun to notice an odd strain of thought in much of my fellows on the Right when it comes to the issue of immigration and jobs.

Simply put, many people who otherwise consider themselves strong, consistent conservatives (and occasionally, but much less often some self-described libertarians) are quite vocal about the importance of protecting “Americans jobs” from the threat of being held by immigrants (most of the time illegal, but in some cases legal as well).

Frankly this mystifies me. Most of these people would readily agree on how much the were opposed to using government stimulus money to try and stop unemployment or what a terrible idea it would be to bring back the WPA. Now, I’m not endorsing either, I think they are bad ideas as well, but I fail to see how it makes sense to be for defending “American jobs” from being held by non-Americans but against defending “American jobs” from being held by no one.

Likewise, to paraphrase Don Boudreaux, if it is so important to ensure that only Americans hold “American jobs,” then why isn’t there an equally loud outcry to take actions to prevent Virginians or Delewareans or Pennsylvanians from holding “Maryland jobs.” After all, if the economic logic that it is better for an American to do a job, even if it costs more, is true, then the same will hold true at smaller levels.

If the Right truly cares about the free market like it claims to, then it is necessary that it support the free market in everything, including labor. You don’t get to pick and choose and still say you support the free market.





Disappointing News on Kyleigh’s Law

5 03 2010

Gregg Trautmann’s lawsuit seeking to overturn Kyleigh’s Law was dismissed after a 40 minute court hearing today:

In a 40-minute ruling, Judge Robert Brennan ruled there is nothing unconstitutional in requiring holders of a Graduated Driver License — primarily teenagers — to affix a decal to their front and rear license plates.

“Operating a motor vehicle is not a right. It is a privilege, subject to state regulations,” Brennan said inside his fourth-floor courtroom.

Rockaway attorney Gregg Trautmann, who filed suit on behalf of his teenage son and nephew, said afterward that he would appeal the ruling — perhaps as soon as Monday.

The judge denied his request to delay the implementation of Kyleigh’s Law on May 1.

I would only note that driving a motor vehicle can (or at least should) only legitimately be considered a privilege granted by the state when the driving is on state roads. Unfortunately, considering the effective government monopoly on roads, I think this calls somewhat into question how far government should be allowed to go in regulating that privilege.

Trautmann has said he will appeal the decision. I can only hope that he finds a more receptive court on the appeal.

On a positive note though, Tom Dillon, a young opponent of Kyleigh’s Law is to be commended, both for taking the time to attend the hearing and for his respectful dialogue with Kyleigh’s mother (the force behind the law):

After the hearing, she was approached by Tim Dillon, am 18-year-old high school senior from Franklin Park who said he founded a Facebook group in opposition to Kyleigh’s Law.

Dillon expressed sympathy for her loss and said he never intended to be disrespectful.

He told a reporter that he disagreed with the judge’s ruling, saying, “I don’t think a sticker on a car will change how people drive.”





Honeymoon Bleg

4 03 2010

For those of you who don’t know, I’m getting married in August. Anyhow, I booked the tickets for the honeymoon a couple days ago. Reina and I are going to Montreal and will be there for about 6 days.

Recommendations for places to go/activities to do?





More on the Problem with E-Verify

25 02 2010

Several weeks ago I did some statistical analysis of the E-Verify system and the impact a mandate of its use in Maryland would have.

Using two different sets of numbers, one very favorable to E-Verify proponents and one a bit more realistic (but probably still tiled in their favor) I found 4% and 11.9% of all positives being false positives.

Well a new report has come out on the effectiveness of the E-Verify system, so I want to update my numbers using it’s information.

The online tool E-Verify, now used voluntarily by employers, wrongly clears illegal workers about 54 percent of the time, according to Westat, a research company that evaluated the system for the Homeland Security Department.

So, using this new info we find the following:

  • The accuracy of the test in identifying illegals as illegals drops from .999/.995 to .46

Therefore, the new formula is (still using the more generous population numbers)

.46(.044)/[.46(.044)+.01(.956)]=.679

1-.679=.321=32.1%

Now continuing to rely on the DHS stated rate of 5.8% positives for illegal status, that gives us a total of 163,374 positives in Maryland. If 32.1% of those positives are in fact false positives it means that 52,443 Marylanders would unjustly be denied the opportunity to work.

The false positive rate was too high before and it’s clearly too high now. We don’t have any business mandating E-Verify use in Maryland or America.

H/T: Greg Siskind





Maryland Central Planning Meeting Re-Scheduled

23 02 2010

The Maryland Department of Planning has announced that one of their scheduled meetings to discuss plans to expand even further the State’s efforts to centrally plan Maryland land use policy has been rescheduled

Due to circumstances beyond our control, the Public Forum that was scheduled for Thursday, March 4, 2010, at the Bowie State University campous has been cancelled.

We apologize for this late notice.  Please be aware that the Maryland Department of Planning is working to re-schedule the forum for this region for June 2010.

Stay tuned for information about this meeting.
Sincerely,
MDP

Just a heads up for those in the Bowie area. I’d suggest keeping an eye out for whenever they reschedule it and consider coming to one of the other meetings in the meantime to make sure the MDP knows Maryland needs less planning, not more, and what planning happens should be as decentralized as possible.





Maryland Central Planning

18 02 2010

Marylanders, take note. The Maryland Department of Planning is looking to expand the scope of its authority.

In fact, I would wager this the beginning of an effort to create a State Planning Commission and eliminate local Planning Commissions.

Now, for the record, I’m against all central planning of the economy, for the reasons so aptly noted by Hayek in The Use of Knowledge in Society and other works:

If we can agree that the economic problem of society is mainly one of rapid adaptation to changes in the particular circumstances of time and place, it would seem to follow that the ultimate decisions must be left to the people who are familiar with these circumstances, who know directly of the relevant changes and of the resources immediately available to meet them. We cannot expect that this problem will be solved by first communicating all this knowledge to a central board which, after integrating all knowledge, issues its orders. We must solve it by some form of decentralization.

I’m with Hayek that price signals are the best means of sorting and disseminating the disparate knowledge of the many actors in our economy, so even local planning commissions are unnecessary. I think the failure of central planning with regards to land use policy is also born out by the facts.

But if we’re going to have some entity centrally planning land use policy, it damn well ought to be done locally. There is simply no possible way that a state level entity can do a better job of compiling, understanding, and acting on the necessary information than a local group, inherently better aware of local conditions and needs can do.

Even more importantly, the bigger something is, the more likely it will fall victim to special interest concerns. In Maryland’s case, it means that land use policy will come to be completely dominated by Montgomery, Prince George’s, and Baltimore counties. We’ve already seen the result of this – just look at the Critical Area law passed a couple of years ago. An arbitrary and egregious assault on private property rights, it fell most heavily by far on Eastern Shore residents.

Regardless of how you feel about land use policy, everyone should object to it being decided by a distant authority, unaware of local conditions and needs, and far more prone to being captured by special interests. I encourage everyone to pass on the word about these meetings and attend as many as possible and speak out against any further consolidation of land use policymaking power in the hands of the State.

Here are the currently announced meeting dates and locations:

WHAT:
6:00 to 7:00 p.m. – Open House, meet State and local officials and community groups
7:00 to 9:00 p.m. – Public Forum including an interactive “Keypad polling” activity and table discussions

WHERE and WHEN:
Thursday, March 4th
Prince George’s County
Bowie State University
Center for Learning & Technology, Auditorium – Room 102 (#2 on campus map)
14000 Jericho Park Road · Bowie, MD 20715 (driving directions) Also easily accessible by MARC Commuter Rail Penn Line and Metrobus
Tuesday, March 9th
Carroll County and Baltimore County (west)
Carroll Community College
“K” Building Auditorium (campus map), ample parking near ampitheatre
1601 Washington Road · Westminster, MD  21157 (driving directions)
Thursday, March 18th
Baltimore City
Coppin State University
Talon Center, Dining & Meeting Hall (#4 on campus map), parking in Lot F
2500 West North Avenue · Baltimore, MD 21216-3698 (driving directions) Also accessible by MTA Metro and Bus
Wednesday, March 24th
Montgomery County
UMD Universities at Shady Grove
Building II, Multi-Purpose room (campus map)
9630 Gudelsky Drive · Rockville, MD 20850 (driving directions) Also easily accessible by Public Transportation
Save the date.  Click here to RSVP. (RSVP is not required but will help us plan for space and attendance)
For more information, call MDP today:
(410) 767-4500

UPDATE: The Maryland Department of Planning has posted an updated list, including confirmed and tentative meeting dates for what looks like almost the rest of the state (Mid-Shore is one of the regions still missing). Here are the additional dates and locations;

Thursday, April 8 – 6:00 to 9:00 p.m.
College of Southern Maryland

Center for Business and Industry, Atrium (campus map)
8730 Mitchell Road · La Plata, MD 20646 (driving directions)

Wednesday, April 14 (tentative) – 6:00 to 9:00 p.m.
Community College of Baltimore County, Essex Campus
Campus location TBA (campus map)
7201 Rossville Boulevard · Baltimore, MD 21237 (driving directions)

Wednesday, April 21 (tentative) – 6:00 to 9:00 p.m.
Anne Arundel Community College
Community College Center (interactive campus map or print)
101 College Parkway · Arnold, MD 21012 (driving directions)

Thursday, May 6 – 6:00 to 9:00 p.m.
Salisbury University
Guerrieri University Center (campus map), parking in Dogwood Lot D or Camden Lot E
1101 Camden Avenue · Salisbury, MD 21801 (driving directions)

Wednesday, May 12 (tentative) – 6:00 to 9:00 p.m.
Washington College
Campus location TBA (campus map)
300 Washington Avenue · Chestertown, MD 21620 (driving directions)

Wednesday, May 19 (tentative) – 6:00 to 9:00 p.m.
Frostburg State University
Campus location TBA (campus map)
101 Braddock Road · Frostburg, MD 21532 (driving directions)

Wednesday, May 26 – 6:00 to 9:00 p.m.
Cecil College
Technology / Conference Center (D on campus map)
1 Seahawk Drive · North East, MD 21901 (driving directions)

OTHER REGIONAL LOCATIONS TO BE SCHEDULED – KEEP POSTED





The Myth of Immigrant Lawlessness

17 02 2010

As a general rule I try and avoid doing posts that do little besides link somewhere else. However Ron Unz’s article from The American Conservative is quite well done and at least ought to be a significant contribution to the immigration debate, so I’m going to do just that.

Please, go and leave my blog now and read up on why claims of Hispanic proclivities towards criminal behaviour are misguided.

And then preferably come back here to read other things. I like having you here.





The (Maryland) Health Care Freedom Act

17 02 2010

A hearing was held today for the Health Care Freedom Act (SB 397) sponsored by Senators Pipkin, Jacobs, and Mooney.

Along with Senator Pipkin (the main force behind the bill) there were probably at least another dozen or so people that came and spoke in favor of it. These included healthcare industry members, an ALEC representative, spokespersons from the Maryland branches of both AFP and the Campaign for Liberty, and of course private citizens.

Only two people came to oppose it, both from branches of the state government.

As I tweeted earlier, I was amongst those speaking in favor of the bill, and if you’re interested you can read the written testimony I submitted. Due to time constraints by oral testimony was much shorter and focused on the two primary arguments for a health insurance mandate and the flaws in said arguments.





Roy Beck’s Curious Vision of Big Government

12 02 2010

Roy Beck, founder and CEO of anti-immigration group NumbersUSA certainly has an interesting take on the idea of big government.

Discussing his talk at the Nashville Tea Party Convention, he explains:

I went to observe and make my case that for those who want to shrink government it isn’t possible without reducing overall immigration (especially LEGAL) immigration

In the actual discussion of his talk he says he emphasized that:

If not for our system of mass immigration over the last decade, there would have been virtually no growth in the uninsured…Just one more example of how current immigration policies create huge pressures for larger and larger government programs and expenditures.

Now, nevermind that it’s grossly inaccurate to describe our current immigration policies as allowing mass immigration and that economists like Keith Hennessy have pegged non-citizens as about only 9.3 of the 45.7 million uninsured. Let’s get to the real fun part of Beck’s claim.

I would love to know what world he lives in where you can have a more restrictive immigration system without:

  • Hiring thousands, if not tens of thousands of additional border guards
  • Mandating a Kafka-esque verification system
  • Requiring everyone to carry a national ID card
  • Empowering (if not outright forcing) local law enforcement officers to demand to see “Your papers, please!”

If this isn’t big, intrusive government, I don’t know what is.

As insane as I think it is, I can accept that some people think these are good policies. What I won’t tolerate is the outright false claim that anti-immigration policies are not big government.